That agreement was made while Donovan was an employee and represented by the police union, he said. Decision to come laterĭonald Jarvis, a lawyer for the Waterloo Regional Police Services Board, argued Monday that Donovan's case should be handled by the Human Rights Tribunal, where a case between the two parties is currently open, or a labour negotiator because it involves Donovan's resignation agreement. The allegations have not been proven in court. She said Larkin's affidavit had a negative impact on her personally and, she alleges, he knew it would. This, Donovan says, goes against her 2017 resignation agreement. The matter addressed on Monday has to do with an affidavit that Waterloo regional police Chief Bryan Larkin filed in December 2017 on a separate civil matter where the police service was being accused of systemic gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment.ĭonovan alleges that as part of that affidavit, Larkin provided examples of work being done by the service and in doing so provided enough details about Donovan's experiences that it would identify her. Kelly Donovan appeared virtually before three justices at the Ontario Court of Appeal Monday afternoon to ask them to overturn a decision made by a judge in April 2021, which said the case should be heard by the tribunal, not a court.ĭonovan was a police officer in Waterloo region until she resigned in 2017. A former Waterloo regional police officer says her case against the service should continue in a court of law, and not be heard by Ontario's Human Rights Tribunal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |